TransDigm Group
Serial acquirer with immense pricing power, 45% operating margins, and a highly decentralized culture
Welcome to another edition of Deep Dives.
TransDigm is a leading supplier of highly engineered, proprietary aircraft components critical to the production of commercial and military aircraft. The company has several attractive attributes, including pricing power, significant intellectual property (IP), a uniquely decentralized culture, and an industry with extremely high barriers to entry.
As a highly successful serial acquirer, TransDigm has delivered extraordinary returns. Since its IPO in 2006, the company has generated an annual return of over 30% when reinvesting dividends, significantly outpacing the S&P 500, which returned 10% annually during the same period.
Despite its already massive success, TransDigm remains well-positioned for future growth, with a long runway to continue expanding while generating significant incremental returns.
What You’ll Read Today
TransDigm’s History
TransDigm’s Business
Products
Moat
Key Financials
Management
Conclusion
Risks
Valuation
TransDigm’s History
TransDigm was founded in 1993 following the sale of four aerospace businesses by Imo Industries, a company that owned several niche manufacturing businesses. At the time, Imo was struggling financially and needed to divest some of its operations, including its Aerospace Components Group.
This group generated just over $50 million in revenue and $10 million in EBITDA. More importantly, the majority of its products were proprietary—a key theme that would shape TransDigm’s success.
Nicholas Howley, who worked at Imo, was tasked with preparing the businesses for sale. However, he had different plans—Howley wanted to buy the aerospace group himself. Along with Doug Peacock, his boss at the time, and private equity firm Kelso & Co., Howley acquired the four aerospace companies. Tensions ran high as Peacock was fired from Imo, and Howley was almost dismissed as well. Ultimately, this didn’t matter, as Howley had already planned to leave.
TransDigm’s foundation rested on four aerospace companies that were not performing well, largely due to downturns in the commercial and defense aerospace industries. To stabilize, TransDigm focused on cutting costs, closing many of its operations, and bringing in new management—many of whom would go on to become senior leaders. At the time, Peacock was CEO and Howley President.
From the beginning, TransDigm adopted a mantra of focusing on price, cost, and new business to create value. The company priced its products not based on cost, but on the value they provided to customers. This strategy, combined with a strong emphasis on cost savings, enabled TransDigm to grow organically year after year.
TransDigm quickly embraced a serial acquisition strategy, growing both organically through its pricing power and aggressively through acquisitions. The company’s acquisition policy was strict, centered around acquiring proprietary, niche aerospace businesses that offered value creation. Today, TransDigm’s acquisition policy remains strict.
By 1998 TransDigm had generated $45 million in EBITDA annually, despite completing only one acquisition—a remarkable achievement in itself. That same year, Kelso & Co. sold its majority stake to another private equity firm, Odyssey, from which point its acquisition activities began to pick up speed. TransDigm’s strategy of acquiring proprietary and niche businesses enabled it to achieve higher margins, strengthen pricing power, reduce competition, and establish higher barriers to entry.
When 9/11 struck, the entire aerospace industry suffered due to the slowdown in air travel. Despite being highly leveraged—TransDigm used debt to fund acquisitions—the company stayed afloat by further cutting costs. In that same year, Howley was promoted to CEO, a role he held until 2018.
In 2003, private equity firm Warburg Pincus acquired TransDigm, but the company went public in 2006. Since then, TransDigm has continued to acquire niche aerospace businesses, with occasional pauses to pay out special dividends during calmer periods.
Today, TransDigm has a market cap of over $75 billion and generated nearly $8 billion in revenue in 2024. The company has acquired almost 100 businesses, solidifying its position as a dominant player in the aerospace sector.
TransDigm’s Business
Products
TransDigm designs and manufactures highly engineered, proprietary aircraft components essential for both commercial and military aircraft. The company’s product range is vast, covering niche but critical systems such as ignition systems, pumps and valves, AC/DC motors, batteries, sensors, switches, cockpit security systems, radios, parachutes, seat belts, and refueling systems.
With an aircraft containing anywhere from 300,000 to 7 million parts, TransDigm likely makes many of them.
Despite operating around 120 manufacturing facilities, the company structures its operations into three main segments:
1. Power & Control
This segment includes systems that generate, manage, and control power using electronic, fluid, mechanical motion control technologies. Key products include actuators, engine components, pumps and valves, and generators.
TransDigm’s primary customers in this segment are engine and power system suppliers, airlines, maintenance suppliers, military buying agencies, and repair depots.
Products are sold both to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), such as Boeing and Airbus, and through the aftermarket channel. The OEM channel is lower-margin due to competitive bidding and strong bargaining power of large OEMs. Additionally, OEM contracts come with strict approval policies for components.
The aftermarket is the primary source of profit for TransDigm, not just within this segment but across the entire business. In this channel, customers buy components as replacements or for repairs. Because these components are essential to an aircraft’s safe operation and subject to strict regulatory standards, customers are often required to buy the same parts initially installed through the OEM channel. With 90% of TransDigm’s products being proprietary, the company holds significant pricing power, as airlines will pay up to keep planes operational. Besides, despite the critical nature of these parts, they are relatively low-cost for customers—most components are priced around $1,000, a tiny sum for airlines in comparison to the cost of aircraft downtime.
The Power & Control segment generated $3.9 billion in revenue for FY2024, with $0.8 billion from OEM sales, $1.2 billion from aftermarket, and $1.9 billion from defense sales to the US military and friendly foreign militaries.
2. Airframe
This segment covers products used in the non-power airframe and cabin structure, such as latching and locking devices, cockpit systems, displays, radios, seat belts, and lighting technology.
Customers include airframe manufacturers, cabin system suppliers, airlines, maintenance suppliers, military buying agencies, and repair depots.
In FY2024, the Airframe segment generated $3.8 billion in revenue, with $1.3 billion from OEMs, $1.3 billion from aftermarket, and $1.2 billion from defense sales.
3. Non-Aviation
TransDigm also operates in non-aviation markets, providing products for industries such as ground transportation, space applications, mining, and construction equipment. The range of products include seat belts, safety restraints, actuators and controls, and refueling systems.
This segment is relatively small, generating $190 million in revenue in 2024.
Moat
The airline industry is notorious for poor returns, with many aerospace companies creating value but failing to capture a chunk of it.
TransDigm’s sub-industry, however, is different. The aerospace components and systems sector has several attractive characteristics, best analyzed through Porter’s Five Forces.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
TransDigm relies on a variety of supplies, including raw materials (metals) and sub-components like semiconductors, sensors, chemicals, wiring, connectors, and batteries. These are fairly standard products, making the supplier base diverse and fragmented. Since most of these inputs are commodities, suppliers hold minimal bargaining power. It’s how TransDigm transforms these materials into specialized products that differentiates them.
Bargaining Power of Buyers
Customers, on the other hand, are a different story. With only a handful of OEMs like Boeing, Airbus, and military agencies, the buyer pool is concentrated. In fact, TransDigm’s top ten customers accounted for 42% of FY2024 revenue, though no single customer contributed more than 10%.
While customer concentration is relatively high, TransDigm holds considerable leverage in the aftermarket. Its products are proprietary, mission-critical, and subject to regulatory requirements, meaning customers must typically purchase the same replacement when needed. With no alternatives available, TransDigm has strong pricing power. Additionally, the aftermarket customer base is far more diverse.
While buyers hold power in the OEM channel, they have far less leverage in the aftermarket.
Threat of Substitutes
TransDigm’s products are highly specialized and protected by IP. In the aftermarket, substitutes essentially do not exist. More broadly, substitutes are difficult to develop due to strict regulatory and safety standards.
The threat of substitutes is low.
Threat of New Entrants
Entering the aerospace components industry requires massive upfront investments—without any guarantee of approval. Components need certification from both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and OEMs, making regulatory hurdles steep.
Beyond approval, the market itself is tough. Each singular component serves a niche, meaning the addressable market per product is tiny. Success requires a broad product portfolio, disincentivizing entry.
Other barriers include:
IP protection
Customer stickiness
Reputation & reliability
Barriers to entry in this industry are extremely high.
Rivalry Among Existing Firms
Despite high barriers to entry and TransDigm’s dominance in many niches, the industry still has several large players, including HEICO (another extremely successful business) and Raytheon Technologies. However, the industry as a whole remains fragmented.
In a 2017 analyst presentation, TransDigm highlighted that the industry consists of around 1,600 businesses, with 60% generating under $25 million in revenue. The industry is far from consolidation.
Rivalry in the OEM channel is relatively high, as reflected in the channel’s lower margins. In the aftermarket, competition is virtually nonexistent.
TransDigm’s moat consists of a diverse and proprietary product range that are mission-critical, extremely high barriers to entry, lasting relationships with customers, but also a unique culture.
A typical trait of serial acquirers is a high degree of decentralization. TransDigm is no exception. TransDigm’s corporate structure is unique in its leanness. Operating units report directly to corporate management—executive vice presidents who have 6 to 8 operating units under their belt. There are no unnecessary layers.
TransDigm treats its managers like owners, fostering intrinsic motivation through a high level of autonomy and control. Managers are responsible for their P&Ls and are the performance of their businesses, with accountability ensured through quarterly reviews and performance-based compensation. Managers are underpaid in cash compensation, but overpaid in equity, only if they perform well. Obviously, this aligns interests with shareholders.
As I discussed in a recent post about measuring moats, a strong workplace culture can be a competitive advantage, and it appears to be just that for TransDigm.
Key Financials
Revenue
TransDigm’s revenue growth has been exceptional, with only a brief setback during COVID. The company has maintained long-term expansion, driven by both organic growth and acquisitions.
Revenue CAGR over different periods:
10-Year: 12.8%
5-Year: 8.7%
3-Year: 18.3%
1-Year: 20.6%
Recent growth remains elevated due to the post-pandemic recovery and increased military spending amid geopolitical tensions. Notably, defense revenue now accounts for 40% of revenue, up from 34% in FY2017 and FY2018. While a key profit driver, this also introduces some risks, which I’ll discuss later.
Between 2005 and 2019, organic growth averaged ~7%, with the remainder coming from acquisitions. Pricing power has been the primary driver of organic growth, while volume plays a smaller role.
TransDigm’s benefits from secular tailwinds that support long-term growth:
Expanding Aircraft Fleet
The global installed base of aircraft has been steadily rising for decades and is projected to grow ~3% annually. Obviously, more planes mean more demand for replacement components.
Rising Air Travel
Revenue passenger kilometers (RPK), a measure of total distance traveled by paying passengers, is expected to grow 6.5% annually through 2029.
Increased Defense Spending
Military budgets in the US and abroad continue to rise, driving sustained demand for aerospace components.
Essentially, investing in TransDigm is a bet on continued growth of air travel and defense spending—both backed by historical trends and the former by rising middle class in emerging markets. Industry consolidation should further support future growth.
Profitability
TransDigm operates very profitably, with operating margins around 45%.
In FY2024, the aftermarket channel accounted for 55% of total revenue but generated ~75% of EBITDA, highlighting its significantly higher margins compared to the OEM channel.
Aftermarket sales are also more stable since OEM manufacturing is cyclical. An aircraft is typically produced for 20 to 30 years, with a useful life of 25 to 30 years, resulting in total product lifecycle exceeding 50 years. This long lifespan ensures consistent demand for replacement parts, making the aftermarket both more resilient and more profitable.
Free cash flow is volatile but that’s not a problem. TransDigm aggressively reinvests cash flow into acquisitions, causing fluctuations—some years (like 2019) see deeply negative free cash flow, while others are flat or moderate. Operating cash flow reveals strong underlying profitability, with FY2024 revenue of ~$8 billion and operating cash flow exceeding $2 billion (a 25% margin).
This reinvestment should translate into a growing capital base and, hopefully, high returns on incremental capital. As seen in the chart below, invested capital continues to rise, while ROIC—both including and excluding goodwill—is improving, suggesting recent investments have been highly accretive. I think including ROIC excluding goodwill provides a clearer view of TransDigm’s underlying profitability. Given that the company is a serial acquirer, goodwill makes up a good portion of invested capital.
Financial Health
TransDigm’s balance sheet is a concern for some investors. The company operates with unusually high leverage, following what management calls a “Private Equity-Like” capital structure. TransDigm aggressively uses debt for acquisitions and even for special dividends, a questionable but so far highly value-accretive strategy. Dividends have been extremely important in the company’s overall shareholder returns.
The company typically maintains a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio between 5x and 7x. It has been able to sustain this level of leverage thanks to high margins, recurring sales, and strong pricing power. A high-quality business can afford to take on more debt.
Today, TransDigm holds $2.5 billion in cash against $24.4 billion in total debt, of which $23.3 billion long-term. Risky at first glance, but the company’s track record speaks for itself. TransDigm has weathered major crises, including 9/11, the Great Recession, a 2017 short seller attack, and COVID, all while highly leveraged.
That said, this is still a balance sheet I generally dislike and am not entirely comfortable with. Yet, TransDigm has repeatedly used debt to generate substantial value.
Normally, I wouldn’t even consider a stock with this kind of balance sheet—because companies with this level of debt are usually low-quality. TransDigm is a rare exception.
Management
Earlier, I briefly touched on TransDigm’s unique culture, which is largely a result of the work done by founders Nicholas Howley and Doug Peacock in establishing the company’s decentralized and lean structure.
Peacock passed away in 2020, and Howley has stepped down from his CEO role in 2018. Today, he serves as the Chairman of the Board, overseeing the executive team. Howley still holds over 720,000 shares. Overall, insiders hold more than 4% of the company, which is rare for a company of TransDigm size. However, just a few years ago, insiders held nearly 10%, with Robert Small—Managing Director at a private equity firm and the Lead Independent Director at TransDigm—significantly reducing his stake from around 5% to 1.4%. Small is not part of the executive team.
TransDigm’s current CEO, Kevin Stein, took the helm in 2018 after serving as COO since 2014. Under Stein’s leadership, TransDigm has continued to grow, increasing revenue from $3.8 billion in 2018 to $7.9 billion today. Importantly, the company’s strategy has remained consistent, with Stein carrying on the vision set by Howley. Stein holds 191,658 shares, valued at approximately $268 million.
Conclusion
Risks
Price Gouging
TransDigm has faced controversy over its military pricing practices over the years, particularly in its dealings with the US Department of Defense (DoD). For example:
“… a defense contractor, TransDigm Group Inc., has received nearly $21 million in excess profits on numerous contracts by acquiring companies with sole-source contracts for spare parts needed by the military and then raising prices dramatically.” —Source
Another instance:
“According to the DOD Office of the Inspector General (OIG), from October 1, 2014 through April 1, 2019, DOD issued 4,697 contracts valued at $634.7 million to TransDigm. For two of those years, the DOD OIG determined that ‘TransDigm earned $16.1 million in excess profit on 46 parts it sold to Defense Logistics Agency and the Army for $26.2 million.’”—Source
The obvious risk is that TransDigm could push too far, straining relationships with key customers. While price increases have been part of its strategy for decades, the issue has only gained public attention in recent years, particularly after the 2017 short seller report focused on price gouging.
However, regulatory scrutiny hasn’t had a meaningful impact so far. Yes, TransDigm has had to refund some excess profits, but these sums are relatively small. Moreover, while defense is an important segment, only 6.5% of sales from FY2019 to FY2023 came from the DoD.
High Debt
While TransDigm has demonstrated its ability to manage high levels of debt, leverage remains a key risk and a dealbreaker for some investors. The business model supports higher debt, but extended downturns could still be problematic, more so for TransDigm than for companies with stronger balance sheets.
Acquisition Runway
TransDigm’s aerospace growth runway isn’t infinite. As industry consolidation progresses, it will become increasingly difficult to find suitable acquisition targets at attractive prices.
“Someday, you're going to have to open the aperture. You're either going to have to stay in the aerospace industry and take less proprietary stuff or you're going to try and stick with your proprietary aftermarket definition and step out of the industry. And we've looked at both of those at different times. We haven't found something compelling enough …”—Nicholas Howley, 2022
For now, the foreseeable future looks strong, but we don’t know what the industry may look like 10-20 years from now. As mentioned earlier, TransDigm has ventured into non-aviation, but this segment remains small and is not growing quickly.
Valuation
TransDigm is a high-quality business despite its risks, and that’s reflected in its market valuation. While I don’t place much weight on the P/E ratio, it does offer a rough sense of valuation. TransDigm currently trades at a P/E ratio of around 50.
Projecting cash flows for TransDigm is difficult due to the volatility in its investing strategy; some years see large acquisitions, while others only small acquisitions. From 2014 to 2024, the company’s free cash flow (after acquisitions) totaled a negative $1.5 billion, highlighting its reliance on debt as a cash source.
One approach is to project free cash flows excluding acquisitions, focusing on organic growth, which has averaged ~7%. Using this method, TransDigm appears drastically overvalued, no matter how long you project the forecast period.
It’s clear that much of TransDigm’s valuation is tied to reinvestment and high returns. Valuing the company presents an interesting challenge, but due to time constraints this week (sorry), I’ll save the full analysis for another post—consider it part two.
For now, TransDigm remains within my investable universe. It’s an extremely strong company, and I believe it deserves a spot in my portfolio—at the right price.
In case you missed it:
Disclaimer: the information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. I am not a financial advisor, and nothing on this platform should be construed as personalized financial advice. All investment decisions should be made based on your own research.